There is a pervasive idea in today’s American society that regardless of political philosophy or party affiliation, one must never criticize the members of the United States military. Conventional wisdom holds that we must appreciate the sacrifice soldiers have made to “fight for our freedom,” and even if one is against the war, they must always “support the troops.” This line of thinking is not coming solely from the pro-war crowd; many of those who consider themselves anti-war (or at least oppose a specific war or conflict) have the utmost regard for those who fight in them. But is this canonization of those who take up arms in the name of the United States government truly just? Or is it a falsehood based on propaganda, emotion, and a lack of critical thinking?

The first myth that must be debunked is the previously-mentioned idea that the job of a soldier is to protect “our freedom.” This assertion is unequivocally untrue. The role of U.S. soldiers, first and foremost, is to obey the orders of their government and commanders, whether these orders support or infringe upon the freedoms of Americans and those in other countries. A soldier is not beholden to the average American, but instead to a small group of people in authority. His job is not to keep us free, but to do what he is told, even if that includes participating in the deaths of innocent people. Propaganda slogans aside (“a government for the people, by the people”), governments are not the people of a country. A soldier is not accountable to us, but to them.

Many troop supporters would also point out that the job of a soldier includes disobeying illegal orders. In theory, this seems like an appropriate safeguard. But in practice, this rarely happens. Take the 2003 Iraq War, for instance, which was viewed by many in the U.S. as an unconstitutional war. The war was also viewed by United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan as a violation of international law. In theory, one would have expected a sizable contingent of soldiers to disobey the orders of President George W. Bush and refuse to step foot on Iraqi soil. Instead, a full-fledged invasion was launched. There are numerous other instances of soldiers breaking the law to do what they are told, whether it be the torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib or the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War. Even for soldiers who refuse to break the law, the legality of a war or order is fairly irrelevant in practice; those who are in power are able to bend the law to their liking, as the Bush administration did when it argued that “enhanced interrogation” (otherwise known as torture) was not in violation of the Geneva Convention. It is entirely possible that an individual soldier could at least attempt to opt out of performing illegal actions. But, there’s a relativity good chance he would be punished instead of commended. Even if he were to succeed without any repercussions, there would still likely be many more soldiers willing to do what he refused to.

The Iraq War is also a relevant example of the falsity of soldiers fighting for our freedom. Saddam Hussein was no threat to the freedoms of everyday Americans. He was not attacking us and had no plans to do so. What American freedoms were at stake in Iraq? The United States government, with its domestic spying, draconian drug laws, and disregard for our civil liberties has done far more to reduce the freedoms of the average American than Saddam Hussein ever did or could have. Yet the war raged on, killing somewhere from 150,000 to 1 million Iraqis (estimates vary) and over 4,000 U.S. soldiers. In reality, the only thing this war did was make Americans less safe. The disposal of Saddam Hussein paved the way for the rise of the Islamic State, which is now viewed as a greater threat to attack the US than Saddam ever was. But beyond that, the killing of civilians (estimated to be more than 100,000 by the Iraq Body Count Project) furthered a problem that the CIA refers to as “blowback.” Blowback is the idea that there are indirect consequences resulting from US military and government actions. In this case, the murder of civilians (dismissed by many as “collateral damage,” as if the victims were less than human) and the destruction of homes from bombings and drone strikes resulted in increased anti-American sentiment, which leads to increased recruitment by terrorist groups and more attacks on innocent people. It’s not hard to imagine why the killing of an innocent family member or friend by a foreign invader could lead to someone having an intense feeling of anger; it only requires us to think of Iraqis as people like us and not statistics. If a foreign invader were bombing American cities and killing civilians, Americans would be rightfully outraged.

Blowback has not just been a problem stemming from the Iraq War; the United States has a long history of meddling in the Middle East. installing dictators (as it did in Iran in 1952), toppling leaders, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people (if not more) in the process. U.S. interventionism in the Middle East was cited by Osama bin Laden as the main reason for his planning of the 9/11 attacks (they did not simply “hate us for our freedoms”). One would be hard-pressed to find an American war in the last fifty years in which our freedoms were actually being protected. Some would say Afghanistan, as the original purpose was said to be finding those responsible for 9/11. But it quickly turned into a nation-building exercise with many of the qualities of the Iraq War.

Even many of those who would agree that the aforementioned wars have made us less safe and agree that the killing of civilians in war is morally reprehensible believe that soldiers do not deserve any of the blame. They blame solely the politicians who send them to war, and excuse the actions of the soldiers by saying that they’re “just doing their jobs.” Of course, the politicians do deserve a great share of the blame and in no way escape moral responsibility for the atrocities they’ve proposed or supported. But such actions could not occur without members of the military willing to carry them out. If it were true that “doing their jobs” excuses their actions, it would mean that someone getting paid for something (even if that something is morally wrong) automatically makes that action ok, or at least excuses the person from any moral responsibility. If this were true, it would be ok for a contract killer to commit a murder; he’s simply doing his job. It would be ok for a slave-catcher to hunt down, kidnap, and return a runaway slave. A Nazi concentration camp guard would not deserve any blame for shooting those who attempt to run away; he is paid to do so, and he is just trying to feed his family. Of course, this is utter nonsense; individuals are responsible for the choices they make and the actions they commit. Soldiers choose to sign up to kill who they are told to by a government. Soldiers are the ones fighting pre-emptive wars against those who have done nothing to them or their country. Soldiers are the ones bombing hospitals to take out a suspected enemy, even though innocent people will be killed or disfigured in the process. Ultimately, unless someone is coerced into an action under the threat of violence or some other type of harm, that person is responsible for the things they do.

This is not to say that all soldiers, or even most, are bad people. While I’m sure there are a collection of soldiers that delight in exercising their power over others or killing those they view as sub-human (as Chris Kyle, the subject of the movie American Sniper, did), I have no problem asserting that many soldiers believe they are doing the right thing. I am also sure that some do so for selfless reasons, like protecting others. But someone believing that they’re doing the right thing does not mean that they actually are. Many who commit horrific acts do not believe they are doing anything wrong. Members of al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups believe that their actions are morally correct; this does not make them so. If soldiers are excused of moral wrongdoing when they aggress upon others because they believe they are protecting our freedoms, one would have to believe al-Qaeda is also excused of moral culpability when they kill innocent people. Every soldier, even the most self-sacrificing, who participates in the war machine shares at least some responsibility. But this is not to say that some don’t join for the benefits, both monetary and otherwise, that they receive. Americans in particular practice a form of troop worship: responding angrily to anyone who dares to criticizes soldiers, thanking soldiers “for their service” without even knowing what they’ve done, and valuing members of the military and veterans as a higher, protected class. Soldiers are also honored at public gatherings and sporting events. Beyond that, soldiers are paid for what they do, and receive benefits such as free or reduced tuition at colleges and universities. They also receive on the job training that can help them in other careers. Regardless of how taboo it is to say in our culture, there are selfish reasons to join the military; a low-skilled worker could create a better future for himself by joining the military than by taking a minimum-wage job.

Americans are taught from a young age in public schools that the government does what is best for us, and as an extension of the government, soldiers are here to protect our freedom. This is a “truth” that many carry with them throughout their lives, never bothering to rethink it and immediately shutting down those who attempt to dispute it. This is not by accident, but instead by design. No one would attempt to disagree that a Catholic school would teach what the Catholic Church would want to be told. No one would disagree that a Jewish school would teach from the viewpoint of Judaism. It is not a stretch to believe that a school run by the government would teach us what the government wants us to believe. Recognizing the differences between logical thought and our preconceived biases is the first step toward ending the reign of the military-industrial complex.

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “No Thank You For Your Service: The Fallacy of Troop Worship

  1. Yep and at the root of it all is humanistic statism… no higher power, no higher standard. When even most Christians do not see the authority of the Bible on such issues, what do we expect?

    Like

  2. Good stuff and well said. Indeed, the nature of war is that there are no rules. Attempting to limit war through rules is like holding a lid down on a boiling cauldron. You’ve gotta take it off from time to time otherwise the whole thing explodes.

    Like

  3. Osama Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11. He was a CIA operative and a patsy. The Mossad and CIA were responsible for that false flag. The ensuing endless wars of terror are to enrich profiteers, destabilize Israhell’s neighbors and usher in the NWO.

    Like

  4. I am sorry your absolutely wrong. First and foremost our military is A DETERRENT.

    I am the Infantry.
    I am my country’s strength in war.
    her deterrent in peace.
    I am the heart of the fight-
    wherever, whenever.
    I carry America’s faith and honor
    against her enemies.
    I am the Queen of Battle.

    You do not have to follow an unlawful order. However, it is not always easy to identify an unlawful order. The average soldier, does not know that it is unconstitutional, thereby unlawful, to invade another country. The soldier puts his confidence in his chain of command, and when the generals are unwilling to face congress and say, “This is an illegal action, and we will not obey.” What makes you think 19 year old private first class Joe, has the sense to do it?

    You can condemn the policy, and you can condemn the policy makers, but you shall not condemn the soldier. The man who, unlike you, has said I will give my very life for my country, whether or not i understand or even believe in my leadership, because I took an OATH to defend the constitution against all enemy’s foreign and domestic.

    G.W. Bush and his cabinet, along with the CIA, pulled the wool over 297 congressman’s eyes. If you want to hate someone, hate the President, his cabinet and those congressman, but do not forget that soldier was their because HE BELIEVED HE WAS DEFENDING YOUR FREEDOM, and WE DID NOT HAVE THE BENEFIT OF THE HINDSIGHT WE HAVE NOW.

    Generally, I do not ask for a thank you for my service, but for you, you beatnik hippy, I will make an exception. I would appreciate if you just thanked me for my service, and shut the hell up, You do not have a clue what your talking about.

    Like

    1. I didn’t say I hated anyone. I reference the fact that many soldiers believe they’re doing the right thing in the article. I don’t know you personally; you might be a great person, or a terrible one. But I won’t thank you for your service.

      Like

    2. Shannon, America wages illegal and immoral “wars” with invasion and destruction of sovereign nations that are no threat, without a declaration of war or an opposing army to fight, slaughtering men, women, and children. Besides directly killing innocent people, the military commits innumerable other war crimes, including the purposeful destruction of civilian infrastructure to harm the population irreparably, killing and displacing millions. Whether those in the United States military know it, they are part of a TERROR ORGANIZATION. So I must not only say “no thank you for your service” but condemn what you have been a part of.

      Like

    3. Shannon, America wages illegal and immoral “wars” with invasion and destruction of sovereign nations that are no threat, without a declaration of war or an opposing army to fight, slaughtering men, women, and children. Besides directly killing innocent people, the military commits innumerable other war crimes, including the purposeful destruction of civilian infrastructure to harm the population irreparably, killing and displacing millions. Whether those in the United States military know it, they are part of a TERROR ORGANIZATION. So not only must I say “no thank you for your service”, I must condemn what you have been a part of.

      Like

  5. I’νe been surfing on-line more than thrᥱe hours toԁay,
    yet I by no means discovered aany interesting article likke
    yours. It’s lovely price ѕufficient for me.
    In my opinion, if all web ownerѕ аnd Ƅloggers made good content material aѕ you
    probably diɗ, the internet will probably Ƅᥱ a lot more helpful than ever before.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I was born in a land where the troops raped/murdered innocent women and children. Before this article existed. I never supported your troops and have always been quietly offended when I see “Support the troops” stickers all over. I’m glad to see other Americans, non-Vietnamese, are sharing the same sentiments.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. As an atheist the christian religion is far more dangerous than Islam, despite the fact that I don’t believe in both the bible and the Koran. But this puzzles me. If a member of ISIS or America’s enemies kill innocent people, they’re sub-human “monsters”, but if any member of the US military does the EXACT SAME THING, especially Mideastern people, they’re “heroes” and are glorified in beer commercials and movies like The Hurt Locker or the f**ktard of a piece of celluloid called American Sniper complete with pictures and footage of their family members. That’s why I HATE present day war movies before they are disgusting piece of pro-american, Islamophobic trash that consumes more hate in the Middle East now since 9/11.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s